Wednesday, September 01, 2010
Monday, June 28, 2010
Is the writing on the wall for Robbie Deans?
There may still be time for Robbie Deans to redeem himself but just get the feeling he is biding his time now and appears to be going through the motions.
The turning point dated back to 13th September, 2008 when the Wallabies lost to the All Blacks 24-28. Had the Wallabies won this game, it would have proven to the ARU they had made the right choice. Self belief would have skyrocketed and their decision somewhat justified. However, they fell short and have never been the same since.
I hate to draw parallels but it's hard to go past the recent happenings to a certain former Prime Minister. For example, calling Robbie Deans 'Dingo Deans' reminded me of Kevin Rudd being called 'Kevin 07' when he was elected and we all know what happened to him.
This kind of hyperbole is an illusion in some ways and disguises or masks reality. Both politics and Rugby needed some sort of saviour and both Rudd and Deans were unfairly held in that regard. Kevin Rudd's undoing was that he failed to realise he won an election, not a popularity contest. Not sure the same could be said for Deans but despite numerous bungles, back flips etc they both still managed to last 3 years in power.
Some will say it Rudd's exit was sudden but you get the feeling the rest of the party saw the writing on the wall sometime ago and it was just a matter of when.
One gets the feeling that Deans is in a similar situation but that doesn't necessarily please the fans and nor should it. Things can turn around pretty quickly and has a habit of making us look foolish but there are too many signs that would suggest the Wallabies are far from ok.
Friday, June 18, 2010
What's happened too running?
While training a client this morning in Sydney's Centennial Park I noticed Michelle Bridges run past with Labour's opposition deputy leader, Julie Bishop and it got me thinking, why has it become less popular in recent years?
Rugby teams and/or players for that matter don't seem to go on road runs like they used to. Why has it fallen out of favour? On the Clint Eastwood produced movie, Invictus, it was interesting to see the Springbok side going for regular team runs and perhaps it was no coincidence they eventually won the World Cup.
There seems to be trend for high intensity type training, rigorous gym sessions, multi skilled training sessions etc to sharpen skills and build muscle but at what cost?
Good old fashion road running helps build stamina and endurance. It helps you focus and keeps your mind on the job. You have to pace yourself to make sure you finish strong and doing it with your team mates can help build morale also. Darren Lockyer is one player that still believes in it and it doesn't seem to have done him any harm. Just not sure why others don't follow his lead?
Sunday, June 13, 2010
All Blacks 59 d Ireland 28
Combined with O'Gara's sin binning, which reduced the Irish to thirteen men for ten minutes, the floodgates opened and by the time O'Gara came back on they were behind 38 points to nil. To their credit the men in green fought back strongly and actually finished with 4 converted tries but arguably much of this could be contributed to the fact that the All Blacks emptied their bench to give everyone a run.
The game actually became very messy toward the end and one can only wonder what the benefit is in giving everyone a run in such unstructured Rugby. In the end it started to resemble a trial more than a test match and became almost farcical. The All Black jumper is becoming cheapened by the day. How many players are they going to use before they settle on their best XV? Yes, supposedly they have great depth and their best team wouldn't be much different then their 3rd or 4th ranked team but that's where the problem lies.
In days gone by their was daylight between the best side and even the 2nd but that's when the All Blacks were at their best. When almost all their starting players would make any side in the world. Now, with the possible exception of Richie McCaw, Dan Carter and Conrad Smith no one else would feature. That's a travesty in my book and the current administration of Graham Henry and co have got it all wrong. They are making the same mistakes all over again. All time effort and energy should be spent on developing the best possible side and if you don't make it, too bad. In the past, when a player got dropped it was a big deal but not anymore. There are too many All Blacks on the scrapheap to even mention here. What is their obsession with rotating and experimenting with players each and every game?
Just pick a side and be done with it already! You guys have lost the plot. Pick players in their specialist postions and get on with it. Take time to nurture them and watch them grow. Out of all the players new to the All Blacks last night the 1 that stood out was Benson Stanley. He was chosen in his specialist postition and just did the basics well. He even made Conrad Smith look good. Too often Ma'a Nonu's game has overshadowed Smith's and even the wingers to some extent. In the words of Wayne Shelford, the All blacks are at their best when everyone does their job ie 14 men helping to put the 15th man over the line. GET BACK TO THE BASICS!
Shouldn't their aim be to beat the Springboks by 1 point than Ireland by 31? At this rate they won't. Although they appear to be going forward they are actually going backward. It's an illusion that will be tested by the Wallabies and shown upo against the Springboks this year. You heard it here first.